Sara Perry has a great new post about blogging, media, and communication on her site, which is part of the "Blogging Archaeology" discussion that is going on at Middle Savagery. Here's my favorite part:
In the interests of brevity, I won’t add to these comments beyond saying that I think we have a responsibility to remember that blogging is simply one form of media, and whilst people (especially academics) like to pick on it as an especially dangerous and uncontrollable communicative device, I think this is misconstrued and blinding. Blogs and social media have advantages and disadvantages—like every other type of communicative tool. By focusing on them alone (as is common in academia), I’m concerned that we are all-too-conveniently avoiding discussion of the limitations and, indeed, prejudices of other modes of publication (e.g., the academic journal or text or edited volume). These modes are often exclusive, insular, and inaccessible (both physically, linguistically and intellectually). They offer limited opportunities to respond. They can become canonised and cemented as truth and, in so doing, serve to perpetuate the status quo.
Read the rest here.