Max Forte over at Zero Anthropology:
You see, this just makes me ask a lot of questions. I think I'm not asking ENOUGH.
Any suggestion that HTS is not about supporting war, and separate from the military-industrial complex and corporate war-profiteering, is at the very least naïve or disingenuous. As soon as corporations become such a significant part of the picture, arguments about “saving lives,” “peace keeping,” and “cultural sensitivity” become, at the very best, secondary concerns. The main concern for any corporation is the accumulation of capital. The main concern for any war corporatist is the accumulation of capital derived from engagement in warfare – the main drive is to maintain the war that produces the contracts that generate revenue and growth.So what exactly IS HTS all about? How is anthropology (and academia) being marshaled toward the war effort? What can (or should) be done about this? Where should anthropologists stand on this matter? What is the purpose of anthropology?
You see, this just makes me ask a lot of questions. I think I'm not asking ENOUGH.